.. _review_rubric:

====================
Plugin Review Rubric
====================

**Reviewer Instructions:** Please review the plugin submission pull request based
on the following criteria:

- [ ] The only modification to ``plugins.json`` was to add a new entry for this plugin;
  no other changes were made
- [ ] The submitter included all required information in the PR description, including:

  - [ ] The plugin repo URL;
  - [ ] A brief description of the plugin's motivation and context;
  - [ ] Acknowledgment of the Code of Conduct

- [ ] The plugin is germane to NatCap's work, broadly (it has to do with nature and/or
  nature's benefits to people)
- [ ] The plugin has documentation
- [ ] The plugin's documentation appears relevant to the plugin's description
- [ ] The plugin's name is unique and appropriate (it adheres to the
  `Code of Conduct <code_of_conduct.html>`_)

**If any of the above criteria were not met, please provide a brief explanation:**

[Explanation of missing / unmet criteria]

----

**After Reviewing:**

* If the submission met all of the above criteria, **Merge the Pull Request**.
* If the submission failed to meet all of the above criteria, leave a comment on the pull
  request, selecting "Request Changes," that:

  * Tags the submitter
  * Include the explanation of which criteria were unmet / which pieces of information
    needed for completing a review were missing
  * Includes the following instructions for the submitter: "Please review the above
    comments and address them accordingly in this PR. Please do not close this PR and
    make a new one."